CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-5820K vs Intel Core i7-5930K
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-5820K is a six-core enthusiast processor that introduced the X99 platform and DDR4 memory to the high-end desktop market, offering a balance of multi-threaded performance and affordability.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Solid performance for older software and moderate rendering tasks, but falls behind modern 6-core CPUs in IPC and clock speed.
Respectable multi-threaded throughput in legacy workloads, but modern chips finish faster while using less power.
Gaming
Playable in modern esports and AAA titles when paired with a strong GPU, but likely to bottleneck top-tier cards in CPU-intensive scenarios.
Playable in older games; struggles with CPU-heavy modern titles at high refresh due to lower IPC and clocks compared to newer CPUs.
Virtualization
Excellent value for home labs due to high core count, VT-d support, and PCIe lane availability for multiple NICs or storage controllers.
Adequate for lab use with its PCIe and memory bandwidth, though limited core count and efficiency by today’s standards.
Efficiency
High power consumption (140W TDP) and heat output compared to 14nm, 10nm, or 7nm counterparts.
High 140 W TDP for 6/12; modern platforms deliver far better performance-per-watt.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI or matrix acceleration hardware.
- AVX2 support offers some vector compute capability.
- No dedicated AI acceleration hardware.
- Suitable only for light CPU-based inference workloads.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Requires discrete graphics; no integrated GPU.
- PCIe 3.0 lanes limit full potential of modern RTX 40-series GPUs.
- Boost clocks are modest by modern standards.
- Multi-GPU support was a highlight in its time, but multi-GPU gaming has declined.
- Capable of 1080p/1440p with a strong GPU, though new titles may bottleneck.
- Boost to 3.7 GHz is modest compared with today’s high-clocked desktop CPUs.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Relatively low entry cost for a used HEDT platform
- Quad-channel DDR4 memory support
- 28 PCIe lanes allow for multiple expansion cards
- Unlocked for overclocking
- Strong multi-core performance for its era
Cons
- High power draw and heat output
- No integrated graphics
- Limited to 28 PCIe lanes (fewer than 5930K/5960X)
- Requires expensive X99 motherboards and DDR4 RAM
- Older architecture lacks modern instruction sets like AVX-512
Pros
- 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes directly from the CPU
- Quad-channel DDR4 memory support
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking
- Solid multi-threaded performance for its era
- Proven X99 platform with broad motherboard options
Cons
- No integrated graphics; a discrete GPU is required
- High 140 W TDP with older 22 nm process
- Lower single-thread performance than modern CPUs
- Platform has no upgrade path beyond Broadwell-E
- Memory support capped at DDR4-2133 officially
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-5820K
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600Rival
Mainstream
- AMD Ryzen 7 1700Rival
Creator
- Intel Core i7-4790KRival
Gaming
- AMD FX-9590Rival
Enthusiast
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-6800KRival
Workstation
If you need the full 40 PCIe lanes for tri-SI or heavy storage arrays.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5600Alt
A modern, significantly faster and more efficient gaming CPU.
- Intel Core i5-12600KAlt
Modern platform with PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 support.
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900XAlt
Massive multi-core performance jump for content creation.
More cores and higher frequency on a still-recent mainstream platform.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i7-5930K
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950XRival
HEDT/High-End Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800XRival
Mainstream Desktop
- RivalCompare head-to-head
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950XRival
HEDT/Workstation
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-6850KRival
HEDT (same platform successor)
Cheaper entry to X99 with 6 cores but fewer PCIe lanes.
Compare head-to-head8-core option on the same platform if you need more cores and lanes.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i9-9900KAlt
Much faster gaming and general performance on a more modern mainstream platform.
- AMD Ryzen 9 5950XAlt
16 cores, far superior performance and efficiency on AM4.
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700XAlt
Strong single-thread performance and modern platform features on AM5.
Our Verdict on Each
The i7-5820K was a groundbreaking value proposition in 2014, bringing DDR4 and quad-channel memory to a lower price point. Today, it remains viable only for budget builds, handicapped by high power consumption and limited PCIe lanes compared to modern standards.
Best for: Building a budget-friendly used workstation for virtualization or light content creation.
Read the full reviewThe i7-5930K was a sensible mid-tier HEDT pick in 2014, offering nearly the same multi-GPU and multi-threaded capabilities as the higher-priced model while costing less. Today, it remains viable for specific workloads that need many PCIe lanes and memory bandwidth, but efficiency and single-thread speeds lag far behind modern chips.
Best for: A very low-cost used HEDT build that needs 40 PCIe lanes and quad-channel DDR4, especially for multi-GPU or many NVMe drives.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-5820K or Intel Core i7-5930K?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-5820K leads with a gaming performance score of 65/100 among Intel Core i7-5820K and Intel Core i7-5930K.
Do Intel Core i7-5820K and Intel Core i7-5930K use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-5820K: FCLGA2011-3 (LGA2011-v3), Intel Core i7-5930K: LGA2011-v3 (FCLGA2011)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.