CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-7640X X-series vs Intel Core i7-5930K
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-7640X is a quad-core, four-thread desktop processor on the LGA2066 platform with base and boost clocks of 4.0 GHz and 4.2 GHz, respectively, dual-channel DDR4-2666 memory, and 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Four cores with no Hyper-Threading limit multi-threaded workloads; better suited to light productivity than heavy rendering or compiling.
Respectable multi-threaded throughput in legacy workloads, but modern chips finish faster while using less power.
Gaming
Sufficient for high-refresh gaming when paired with a strong GPU, but constrained by lack of Hyper-Threading and limited core count in modern titles.
Playable in older games; struggles with CPU-heavy modern titles at high refresh due to lower IPC and clocks compared to newer CPUs.
Virtualization
Can run modest VM loads, but core and thread count make it less ideal for multiple concurrent VMs.
Adequate for lab use with its PCIe and memory bandwidth, though limited core count and efficiency by today’s standards.
Efficiency
High 112 W TDP for a quad-core design results in lower performance-per-watt than newer mainstream platforms.
High 140 W TDP for 6/12; modern platforms deliver far better performance-per-watt.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI acceleration; CPU-bound inference only.
- Lacks AVX-512; limited to SSE4.1/4.2 and AVX2 instruction sets.
- No dedicated AI acceleration hardware.
- Suitable only for light CPU-based inference workloads.
Content Creation
Gaming
- High clocks help in CPU-bound scenarios, but modern games increasingly benefit from more cores/threads.
- Requires a discrete GPU; no integrated graphics.
- Performance comparable to contemporary mainstream Kaby Lake i5s when GPU-bound.
- Multi-GPU support was a highlight in its time, but multi-GPU gaming has declined.
- Capable of 1080p/1440p with a strong GPU, though new titles may bottleneck.
- Boost to 3.7 GHz is modest compared with today’s high-clocked desktop CPUs.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- High base and boost clock speeds
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking
- Supports Intel Optane Memory
- VT-x and VT-d virtualization support
- DDR4-2666 dual-channel memory support
Cons
- No integrated graphics requires a discrete GPU
- No Hyper-Threading; only four threads
- Only dual-channel memory on a HEDT platform
- Only 16 CPU PCIe 3.0 lanes
- Discontinued platform with limited upgrade options
Pros
- 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes directly from the CPU
- Quad-channel DDR4 memory support
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking
- Solid multi-threaded performance for its era
- Proven X99 platform with broad motherboard options
Cons
- No integrated graphics; a discrete GPU is required
- High 140 W TDP with older 22 nm process
- Lower single-thread performance than modern CPUs
- Platform has no upgrade path beyond Broadwell-E
- Memory support capped at DDR4-2133 officially
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-7640X X-series
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600Rival
Mainstream
- AMD Ryzen 5 1500XRival
Mainstream
- Intel Core i5-7600KRival
Mainstream
- Intel Core i7-7700KRival
Mainstream
- Intel Core i7-7740XRival
HEDT
- Intel Core i5-8400Alt
Six-core mainstream Coffee Lake with better multi-threaded performance.
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600Alt
Six cores, 12 threads on AM4 with superior efficiency and upgrade path.
- Intel Core i5-9600KAlt
Later-generation six-core with higher clocks and improved platform longevity.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
Zen 2 six-core with much higher IPC and efficiency on AM4.
- Intel Core i5-10600KAlt
Six-core, 12-thread Comet Lake on modern platform with DDR4 and better connectivity.
Intel Core i7-5930K
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950XRival
HEDT/High-End Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800XRival
Mainstream Desktop
- RivalCompare head-to-head
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950XRival
HEDT/Workstation
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-6850KRival
HEDT (same platform successor)
Cheaper entry to X99 with 6 cores but fewer PCIe lanes.
Compare head-to-head8-core option on the same platform if you need more cores and lanes.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i9-9900KAlt
Much faster gaming and general performance on a more modern mainstream platform.
- AMD Ryzen 9 5950XAlt
16 cores, far superior performance and efficiency on AM4.
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700XAlt
Strong single-thread performance and modern platform features on AM5.
Our Verdict on Each
A capable but ill-positioned quad-core for the X299 HEDT platform, offering strong clock speeds yet lacking Hyper-Threading, integrated graphics, and the multi-threaded punch of contemporaries; mainly relevant today for specific upgrades or used-market builds.
Best for: Upgrading an existing X299 system on a tight budget or acquiring used parts at low cost
Read the full reviewThe i7-5930K was a sensible mid-tier HEDT pick in 2014, offering nearly the same multi-GPU and multi-threaded capabilities as the higher-priced model while costing less. Today, it remains viable for specific workloads that need many PCIe lanes and memory bandwidth, but efficiency and single-thread speeds lag far behind modern chips.
Best for: A very low-cost used HEDT build that needs 40 PCIe lanes and quad-channel DDR4, especially for multi-GPU or many NVMe drives.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-7640X X-series or Intel Core i7-5930K?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-5930K comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-7640X X-series or Intel Core i7-5930K?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-7640X X-series leads with a gaming performance score of 72/100 among Intel Core i5-7640X X-series and Intel Core i7-5930K.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-7640X X-series has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-7640X X-series (112 W), Intel Core i7-5930K (140 W).
Do Intel Core i5-7640X X-series and Intel Core i7-5930K use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-7640X X-series: FCLGA2066, Intel Core i7-5930K: LGA2011-v3 (FCLGA2011)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i7-5930K has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i5-7640X X-series (4 cores), Intel Core i7-5930K (6 cores).