CPU Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 325
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor in AMD’s Ryzen AI PRO 400 “Gorgon Point” family, combining two Zen 5 and four Zen 5c CPU cores with a Radeon 840M RDNA 3.5 iGPU and an XDNA 2 NPU rated at up to 50 TOPS. It targets business and professional laptops with enterprise manageability, strong multi‑threaded performance, and on‑device AI acceleration for Copilot+ PC workflows.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Six Zen 5/5c cores and 12 threads deliver strong responsiveness in heavy office multitasking, large spreadsheets, and browser‑heavy workflows, with competitive multi‑threaded performance versus other 28 W mobile APUs.
Smooth everyday office and multitasking performance with responsive single‑thread and enough multi‑thread headroom for typical creator workloads.
Gaming
The Radeon 840M iGPU provides playable 1080p performance in e‑sports and older titles at low–medium settings, but newer AAA games often require reduced settings or upscaling. It is best thought of as a capable business graphics solution rather than a gaming‑oriented GPU.
Capable 1080p integrated gaming performance for a thin‑and‑light SoC, but not at the level of higher‑TGP gaming SKUs or small discrete GPUs.
Virtualization
Support for ECC (with platform), 256 GB memory capacity, and AMD‑V makes it suitable for light VM workloads, though heavy virtualization is better served by higher‑core HX‑class parts.
Adequate for light VM usage, but limited core count and no SMT make it less ideal for heavy multi‑VM workloads than higher‑end SKUs.
Efficiency
The 4 nm process and heterogeneous Zen 5/5c core layout allow good performance per watt in the 28 W envelope, with configurable TDP down to 15 W for battery‑focused designs.
Strong efficiency for its performance envelope thanks to the 18A process and low‑power LP‑cores, especially at 25 W base power.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Up to 50 TOPS from the XDNA 2 NPU plus additional CPU/GPU compute gives a total platform AI capability of up to 59 TOPS.
- Targeted at Copilot+ PC experiences: local LLMs, Recall‑style indexing, AI‑assisted collaboration tools, and business‑focused AI features.
- NPU offload can improve battery life and responsiveness compared to CPU‑only AI inference, especially in always‑on AI assistants and background recognition tasks.
- 47 TOPS NPU supports Windows Studio Effects and on‑device inference
- 40 TOPS GPU AI compute complements NPU for hybrid workloads
- Total CPU+GPU+NPU TOPS competitive for mainstream thin‑and‑light AI PCs
Content Creation
Gaming
- Radeon 840M with 4 RDNA 3.5 CUs at up to 2.8 GHz is faster than older Vega‑based iGPUs but slower than 8‑CU Radeon 860M parts.
- Suitable for e‑sports and older AAA titles at 1080p low–medium; newer AAA games typically require 720p/900p or upscaling.
- Hardware AV1 decode/encode and modern display outputs (DP 2.1, HDMI 2.1) support high‑refresh external monitors and multimedia use.
- 4‑core Xe3 iGPU suitable for 1080p low/medium in many titles
- Much faster than older 11th‑gen Xe but slower than 8‑core Xe or Arc B‑series iGPUs
- Best for light and casual gaming rather than high‑refresh or high‑detail AAA
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Solid 6C/12T performance in a 28 W envelope with Zen 5/5c cores
- Strong on‑device AI via 50 TOPS XDNA 2 NPU for Copilot+ experiences
- Radeon 840M iGPU with RDNA 3.5 and AV1 encode/decode is very capable for integrated graphics
- Enterprise‑grade PRO security and manageability features for business deployments
- Configurable 15–54 W TDP gives OEMs flexibility across thin‑and‑light and performance designs
Cons
- Not intended for enthusiast overclocking; EXPO and unlocked multiplier are absent
- Only 8 MB L3 cache and 4 CUs on the iGPU limit heavy creator and gaming workloads vs higher SKUs
- PCIe 4.0 only, while some competitors are moving to PCIe 5.0 in premium segments
- As an OEM‑only mobile APU, it is not available as a retail boxed CPU for DIY builders
Pros
- Strong single‑thread and responsiveness for everyday tasks
- Meaningful AI compute with 47 TOPS NPU and 40 TOPS GPU
- Good efficiency on Intel 18A at 25 W base power
- Capable 4‑core Xe3 iGPU with AV1 and modern display outputs
- 12 MB Smart Cache improves gaming and threaded workloads
- Supports DDR5‑6400 and LPDDR5X‑7467 with up to 128 GB RAM
Cons
- Only 8 threads with no SMT; weaker in heavily threaded workloads than higher‑core SKUs
- Locked multiplier limits overclocking headroom
- 12 PCIe lanes may constrain expansion in some designs
- Only four P‑cores; not ideal for sustained all‑core workloads compared to 6+ core rivals
- OEM‑dependent GPU branding (Intel Graphics vs Arc) can be confusing
Competitors & Alternatives
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 338HRival
Business / AI PC Laptop
- Intel Core Ultra 5 235H / 245HRival
Business / AI PC Laptop
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340Rival
Business / AI PC Laptop
- Compare head-to-headAMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440Rival
Business / AI PC Laptop
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite / X PlusRival
Always‑Connected AI PC Laptop
8 CPU cores and Radeon 860M iGPU for users who can trade some efficiency for significantly higher multi‑threaded and graphics performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 8640U / 8640HSAlt
Older but mature Zen 4‑class mobile APU with good Linux support and strong efficiency if you don’t need the latest NPU features.
- Apple M5 (entry model)Alt
Excellent efficiency and integrated performance for macOS users who don’t require x86 compatibility or enterprise manageability features.
Intel Core Ultra 5 325
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Rival
Mainstream Mobile AI APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 332Rival
Mainstream Mobile / Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 7 355Rival
Mainstream Mobile / Premium Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 322Rival
Entry-Level Mobile / Value
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840URival
Thin-and-Light Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 5 125HAlt
Older Meteor Lake part with 14 cores/18 threads; more threaded performance but lower efficiency and weaker NPU/GPU AI features.
Our Verdict on Each
A well‑balanced business APU with solid CPU performance, a capable RDNA 3.5 iGPU, and strong on‑device AI for its power envelope; best for professionals who need Copilot+ and enterprise features rather than purely maximum gaming or creator performance.
Best for: You’re buying a business or professional laptop prioritized for enterprise manageability, long battery life, and on‑device AI (Copilot+), and you don’t need a high‑end discrete GPU or maximum CPU cores.
Read the full reviewA solid mainstream mobile SoC that delivers meaningful CPU and NPU upgrades over prior Ultra 5 generations, with good efficiency and capable integrated graphics—best for users who want AI features and balanced performance in a thin laptop rather than outright compute headroom.
Best for: Thin‑and‑light AI PC where you want strong efficiency, modern AI features, and better integrated graphics than older Ultra 5 chips, but don’t need the extra cores or GPU power of Core Ultra 7 or X7 SKUs.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 or Intel Core Ultra 5 325?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 5 325 leads with a gaming performance score of 78/100 among AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Intel Core Ultra 5 325.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 325 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (28 W), Intel Core Ultra 5 325 (25 W).
Do AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Intel Core Ultra 5 325 use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435: FP8, Intel Core Ultra 5 325: FCBGA2540), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 325 has the most cores. Core counts: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (6 cores), Intel Core Ultra 5 325 (8 cores).